At this point it is worth mentioning once again that work derives from Newton's definition of force in his Second Law. As such, we must, strictly speaking, confine our definition of work to particles in inertial frames. Finite 3-dimensional objects are more complicated, but this definition works pretty well as an approximation for many objects. Soon we will be able to replace the approximation for three-dimensional objects by an exact statement about the motion of a particular point for an object, a point we will call the center-of-mass. More on that later.
We might consider an example to show how this definition works. Suppose that you pick up a box from the floor, hold it in your arms, and carry it across the room before setting it back on the floor. What is the net work done by you in this whole operation?
Solution: First, in picking up the box, you do net work Wup = mboxgh where h is the height at which you hold the box in your arms. As you walk across the floor, you do no work as you are not applying any horizontal forces to the box (assuming you walk without acceleration) and the only other forces on the box are in the vertical direction and therefore perpendicular to the box's displacement. At the other side of the room you place the box down. If you are not dropping the box, but let it down at constant velocity, then you must apply a force of magnitude mboxg to the box over the distance -h, so the work done going down is Wdown = -mboxgh. The net work for the whole operation is Wnet = Wup + Wdown = 0.
The table below summarizes the work done by you and by the Earth's gravity for this operation.
| Work Done | |||||||||||||
|
|
As noted in the textbook, the work done by gravity is distinct from work done by friction. Namely, if we lift, with constant velocity, an object in a gravitational field, and then lower it to its original position, the total work done is zero since work depends only on the change in vertical height. We call such forces conservative. Friction is not conservative since if we drag a block on any surface with friction, the work done depends only on how far we dragged it, not where the path of travel began and ended. Conservative forces have the nice property of being able to be defined in terms of a potential energy. The usual definition of potential energy is through the work-energy theorem as for kinetic energy, i.e. W = Ui - Uf. We can define a change in potential energy also through the action of a force over a distance. The potential energy is useful in that it keeps us from calculating the work done by a force when the path is complicated, or tedious to follow. Since the work done depends only on the initial and final positions, the change in potential (and kinetic) energy depends only on change in position as well. Through the work energy theorem, we have Kf - Ki = W = Ui - Uf ==> Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf = constant = E where E is called the total mechanical energy.
In general we can define any combination of conservative and non-conservative forces acting on particles as obeying the principal of conservation of mechanical energy. This general rule is expressed mathematically as
The expression states that any non-conservation of energy is due to work done by forces which do not conserve mechanical energy. Generally, this energy shows up as other, harder-to-measure, forms of energy such as heat. The principle of total energy conservation when all forms of energy are considered took many years to prove and required input from other fields of science, principally chemistry.
Why are roller coaster loops made into egg-shaped ovals
rather than circles? First, start with the fact that the
ride begins by lifting the cars to a large height, then
allowing gravity to power the rest of the ride. We can
use conservation of energy and and knowledge of circular
motion to predict what would happen for a circular loop
as depicted below.
If we follow this prescription, then, setting the origin of our coordinate system at ground height, the initial mechanical energy of the coaster car (assume mass m) is
and the mechanical energy, neglecting friction, at the bottom of the coaster loop is
At the top of the coaster loop we have
Solution:
The normal force must be just greater than zero at all points
around the loop else it means the car loses contact with
the track or the passenger with the seat. The force diagrams
are shown in the figure above. We want, at the top,
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This sets the absolute minimum speed for the coaster car. To get to this minimum speed we must have h greater than a minimum height set by energy conservation.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Solution:
To get that, we first need the speed at the
bottom assuming the minimum height for h.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The normal force at the bottom of the loop is determined by the necessity of satisfying the centripetal condition (i.e. for the car to stay on the track, the gravitational and normal forces must add up to a net force which satisfies the centripetal condition)
| ||||||||||||||||||
So the poor passenger at the bottom experiences 6 g's. Remember that this is for the minimum height. Many people would quickly black out at this acceleration.
Hits since 10/15/99: