Review of the Concept of Work

Work is useful as a calculational quantity only if we are careful to say the work done by a force is actually responsible for changing the motion of the object. If the object doesn't move or if its motion has no component along the direction of the force, then the work done by that force is zero. This follows the reductionist philosophy of physics in that we look at only that part of the change (in this case the change in kinetic energy) due to one of what may be several forces acting on an object. We use the dot product to signify that only the portion of the force which is parallel to the displacement (or, equivalently, the portion of the displacement which is parallel to the force) is relevant. So, formally, work is defined as

W = F*s cosq = F·s

At this point it is worth mentioning once again that work derives from Newton's definition of force in his Second Law. As such, we must, strictly speaking, confine our definition of work to particles in inertial frames. Finite 3-dimensional objects are more complicated, but this definition works pretty well as an approximation for many objects. Soon we will be able to replace the approximation for three-dimensional objects by an exact statement about the motion of a particular point for an object, a point we will call the center-of-mass. More on that later.



Potential Energy and Total Mechanical Energy

As noted in the textbook, the work done by gravity is distinct from work done by friction. Namely, if we lift, with constant velocity, an object in a gravitational field, and then lower it to its original position, the total work done is zero since work depends only on the change in vertical height. We call such forces conservative. Friction is not conservative since if we drag a block on any surface with friction, the work done depends only on how far we dragged it, not where the path of travel began and ended. Conservative forces have the nice property of being able to be defined in terms of a potential energy. The usual definition of potential energy is through the work-energy theorem as for kinetic energy, i.e. W = Ui - Uf. We can define a change in potential energy also through the action of a force over a distance. The potential energy is useful in that it keeps us from calculating the work done by a force when the path is complicated, or tedious to follow. Since the work done depends only on the initial and final positions, the change in potential (and kinetic) energy depends only on change in position as well. Through the work energy theorem, we have Kf - Ki = W = Ui - Uf ==> Ki + Ui = Kf + Uf = constant = E where E is called the total mechanical energy.

In general we can define any combination of conservative and non-conservative forces acting on particles as obeying the principal of conservation of mechanical energy. This general rule is expressed mathematically as

K0 + U0 = Kf + Uf + Wnon-cons.

The expression states that any non-conservation of energy is due to work done by forces which do not conserve mechanical energy. Generally, this energy shows up as other, harder-to-measure, forms of energy such as heat. The principle of total energy conservation when all forms of energy are considered took many years to prove and required input from other fields of science, principally chemistry.



Lecture Question 2

To keep the ride ``interesting'' but not perilous, the radius of the loop at the bottom has to be wider than at the top of the loop. What ratio of bottom radius to top radius would result in a safe 3 g's for the passengers coming to the bottom of the loop?



Hits since 10/15/99: