``Hence have arisen some new terms among us. We say B (and bodies like circumstanced) is electrized positively; A, negatively. Or rather, B is electrized plus; A, minus. And we daily in our experiments electrize plus or minus, as we think proper.''
- Benjamin Franklin
Electrical charge, like mass, is an intrinsic property of matter. It shares many of the properties of mass in fact. The most important ones that we have discovered over the ages are that
In addition, there are some things that charges do not share in common with mass:
That last caveat is important. It turns out that, ultimately, charge and mass do share the property of being intrinsic to matter, i.e. elementary particles have a definite mass and a {\it fixed} charge. Thus, the fact that we can transfer electrical charges between objects is explained by stating that this takes place by the actual exchange of charged particles. Thus, the charges involved are not created or destroyed anywhere, just transferred from one object to another by the exchange of small (essentially invisible) charged particles (which we now know are usually, but not always, electrons).
As neat as the above explanation is, it still does not explain all electrical observations you can make though. For example, two elementary particles (e.g. an electron and a proton) exert forces on each other without the exchange of anything "charged" between them. We can also see that macroscopic objects which are "neutral" can be subject to electrical forces without making any physical connection between them and any other object (this is referred to as induced charging). Hence we have to infer that "something" permeates the space between electrically charged objects to exert a force on them. We explain this "something" as being the electric field. Before describing it's properties, let's first work backwards, or operationally, i.e. let's say what the field does and let that serve as our definition of what it is.
The force between charged particles was described on the basis of sensitive experiments by Charles Augustin Coulomb in a formula known as Coulomb's Law. Assume two charges, 1 and 2, are separated by a distance r12. Since charges come in two types, we can have two cases: the charges are the same "sign" (i.e. both positive or both negative) or they are opposite (i.e. one is positive and the other negative). For either of these two cases, Coulomb found that the magnitude of the force between the particles was
| (1.1.0.1) |
where the magnitude of the charges are expressed in units of Coulombs (C) in the SI system of units. The proportionality constant k has an experimentally determined value of 9.0 × 109 N · m2/C2. To complete the picture, we have to define the direction of the force and define what it acts on. Experimentally, we observe for our two cases (i.e. both charges have the same sign or the charges have opposite signs) that the forces acting look as follows:
Thus, to complete our definitions of the forces produced, we go to the vector expression of Coulomb's Law.
| (1.1.0.2) |
This is the force on charge q2 due to charge q1. To get the proper direction, we need to note two things.
Let's consider an application of Coulomb's Law. Since the elementary case of a single charge is already explained, let's consider three stationary charges. We will not specify the magnitudes or even the signs of the charges to emphasize that the approach to the problem of calculating the forces is independent of these actual values. The answer certainly depends on having this information, but the solution depends only on the mathematical nature of electrical forces as expressed through Coulomb's Law.

| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Send comments to larryg@upenn5.hep.upenn.edu.
This page was last modified on 01/14/2003 at 18:16:40 (EST).
Current date/time is Saturday, 07-Nov-2009 23:37:04 EST
09395 hits since